Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Learning through experience

The legendary 7-eleven
Yesterday, 8th November 2010, marks the day of my last presentation for ES2007S. Looking back, I really have to thank my team mates, Yong Chean, May and Wei Ping for all the hard work for the past 8 weeks. You guys have really shown me what project work is all about. It might be a coincidence that the three of them are from the engineering faculty. When the project first started, I have to admit that I was not very comfortable with the group. The approach taken was very “unconventional” in my sense. As time progresses, I started to adapt to the way things are done and yes, we overcome several obstacles as a group. There was the oral discussion, there was the proposal and finally, the oral presentation that took place yesterday – a presentation that I will perhaps, remember for the rest of my life.

Preparations
Personally, I feel that rehearsals are really important for group presentations. Due to the packed schedules of each individual, we only had rehearsals on Sunday. Prior to the multiple rehearsals we had on Sunday, each member of the team actually drafted out a “script” for our respective parts and they were placed together to see if the flow of the presentation was good. From the product that we presented yesterday, I think that this is actually a good strategy. For a presentation to be smooth, I think it is essential that everyone in the team not only knows about his or her own part but also the parts of the other team mates.

For me, I went through the presentation in my head several times before going to bed on Sunday.  On the whole, I feel that I have done enough preparation for content as well as preparing myself mentally for the presentation.

Delivery
Being the first speaker after the brief introduction by Yong Chean was actually quite stressful. It is the first time that I am doing a presentation whereby I have to “sell” the proposal.  I think I was loud enough and was articulating well when I was presenting. However, I was a little disturbed by the photos that were flashed on the screen.

These photos were meant to compliment my part of the presentation to really bring out the current situation of the students. Due to the bad resolution, I noticed that many of the audiences were trying to figure out what was on the picture. I tried to remedy the situation by switching off the light for certain photos and switching it on again after the photo. I guess this was something that I should have avoided as they were really very distracting.

The “technical glitch” had also thrown me off the track and I felt that my presentation was not as concrete as what I had planned. I mentioned words like “feasible” which I feel that is not really very appropriate since my team has yet to share the solution with the audience.

I am not sure if my eye contacts were good, but I did try to establish some form of eye contact with the audience.  I cannot recall on my non-verbal. Hence, it would be really nice if some of you can feedback on this.

 Visual aid/Slides
I think my slides were fine except for the bad resolutions of the photo. There were minimal words; hence the audience would be putting their attention on me. The slides were simple and the animations were placed there for a purpose – to catch the attention of the audience. The video was quite well done and I feel that the duration was just right.

Overall, I felt that the slides for the group were quite organized. The slides for each person did not deviate in style very drastically and I feel that we managed to link our parts quite smoothly.

It would really be appreciated if all of you can give some feedback regarding the presentation. Some recommendations and tips on how to improve would be great! Last but not least, if you have burning questions regarding the presentation and did not have a chance to ask in class, feel free to list them in the comment area, my team and I will certainly clarify your queries.

Thanks for being such wonderful audience! =)
(Edited)

14 comments:

  1. Whoops, sorry for the long post. Guess it is not very concise.

    Well, it is a reflection... =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stan Stan Stan!! Where's the SpiderMan?!?? AHAHA!!

    Anyways... I don’t think you’re the only one who would have difficulty working with people who have different styles and approaches. This is something that we all must face sooner or later. The important thing is that we learn to adapt and adjust ourselves appropriately to each situation. *Ahem* What’s wrong with engineers!? We’re meticulous, mythological, systematic and analytical. Could you ask for anything better? AHAHA!!!

    I think that it was in all a job well done. The proposal was sold convincingly. Your plan was clear and comprehensive. It was evident that there were rehearsals before hand as the flow of the presentation was smooth and the ideas were fluent. Of course having a few more rehearsal would have helped tightened the group even more.

    Your vocal project and articulation was good. Your speech was clear and the pace was easy to follow. In my opinion, I don’t really think you should worry about using the wrong words at the wrong time. The audience would be more interested in the ideas you have to put forth. Unless the words have too strong a meaning or provides too little emphasis on the points you wish to propose. For example “I besiege you to consider our points” would be a little too heavy and probably would not be appropriate.

    Hand gestures were good as they accompanied what you said in expressing your emotions. This allowed your audience to relate to what you were trying to tell them.

    The slides were good. Color contrast was not overlooked which made reading what was on the slides easy.

    I feel the problem with your photos was not really the either ambient lighting or the resolution. I get the sense that you were trying to portray the areas as dark and inconducive for study. This was fine in itself; however you used the same photo to demonstrate the security risk which would have been more apparent if the risks could actually be seen. What I mean is that, two photos could have been used instead. One demonstrating the low lighting students have to put up with and another, taken probably with the flash on, to show the risks you were trying to illustrate.

    About the ambient lightings, I felt that you could have perhaps left a few lights on and turned the rest off to provide a better visual environment for viewing the photos. Switching off and on the lights in such short intervals was definitely a distraction.

    Overall, it was a good proposal presentation. Evidence was provided to substantiate what and how you were going to change which made accepting it easier.


    Sorry if this is a bit long but I tried to comment based on your blog posting!! ahaha!! Lesson learnt eh Stan.. ahah..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Stanley,

    I think your team's Oral Presentation was a solid one. Well done! I have posted comment on May's blog regarding your team's performance.

    Stanley, you started off great actually. I was immediately forced to focus with your strong emphasis on the validity of the problem and it should be solved. I agree with you that visual aids do make an impact in your pitch and yes, now that you mentioned it, you were off a bit when switching off the lights. I totally agree with you on the importance of rehearsal and the responsibility each team member carries in understanding the whole proposal.

    Your part was on NEEDS and I think you have clearly expressed and elaborated on the needs with simple and direct English. You appear confident and looked decently comfortable. There was a tiny hint of nervousness through your non-verbals, but that's all. Overall, it was an effective pitch and I felt that something truly needs to be done.

    Nevertheless (oh yea, you think I would miss this one out eh? LOL), your voice projection was strong, a bit too strong it may appeared jarring. Also, I realised your eye contact was constant at one place.

    All in all, I think you presented well (but there was not much improvement from peer teaching since you had also presented well back then!) :D

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stanley!

    I must say that perhaps I am the one who was not too easy to work with this time round. Having loads of responsibilities at the same time does make me less patient. I really want to thank you for putting up with me, especially when I sounded impatient or too straight-forward. You are really one of the most patient guy I've met! Applause!!

    Daniel, I totally agree with you, "We’re meticulous, mythological, systematic and analytical. Could you ask for anything better? AHAHA!!! "

    I think you did very well in the presentation. Yea, perhaps improvement can be done on the photos part. For a year 2, I dare say you were very professional on your presentation. Perhaps a few more similar kind of presentation will perfect your skills! I really appreciate your preparation for the slides with the details given to each animation and the script, not to mention staying late at school to take those photos! Your commitment does show! Keep on keeping on!

    Maybe also to address Daniel's comment. I think each of us are just trying to defend our proposal. There are many dimensions to one issue, and each of us are trying to explain the different dimensions of it, but wasn't coherent in the end. Thanks for the comment. I wouldn't have realised it if you didn't mention them.

    YC

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Stanley,

    Thank you for the smooth delivery on your part (aside from the picture slides). Like what Yong Xin, you started selling the proposal from the start. You stood in front of the audience, had clear and loud voice projection, was clear in your diction. Steady!

    In terms of your delivery, I begged to differ about your action to switch the lights off. I saw that as a quick response from your part after noticing that the audience was straining their eyes to see the pictures. :)Perhaps you could have stepped a bit backwards when you presented the pictures slide (not really sure if this is the best idea, what do you think?), so that we'll focus more on the slides, just for this part.

    As for non-verbals, I think you have a tendency to nod your head as you switch your eyes from person-to-person (am I right? Pls correct me if I'm wrong :P) but that's not a problem I feel. You can hold your gaze on each person for a tad longer to make your speech even more effective. :)

    Overall, I enjoyed your presentation! Thank you! :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Daniel and YC!

    Thats a long comment, but no doubt, it will definitely help me improve as a presenter. =D

    This is the first time I am using slides that had minimal words and just photos. I will take note on the idea about 1 picture to bring out 1 point so as not to confuse the audience. My initial intention was to link them up to show that they are all related and not seperate situation. Think it did not turn out that clearly. Will use this as a lesson learn and take note for future presentation. =P

    I have to agree that engineers are meticulous, mythological, systematic and analytical and looking at the product that 7 eleven has produced, indeed i cannot you ask for anything better. =)

    What I really meant was that my group members were too meticulous, mythological, systematic and analytical to the point that I feel inferior (to some extend). They were very straight to the point and focused. Not like my ex-group mates in the other module. (remember my second post about IT1001?)

    YC, I understand the stress you were under during this period of time and I thought that you were really patient with me.(with all my nonsense)

    Lastly, sorry guys for the distracting lights! I will suggest to Science to have the projectors change if I have the chance. Think it would be good if the next batch of students were to focus on the topic of improving the facilities in Science since this is were the lesson would be conducted.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Stanley, firstly let me say that you projected confidence and I could really make eye contact with you during your presentation, which made me feel personally involved and engaged.

    You communicated your ideas about the current problems about the study environment in a clear and reasonably concise manner. Like you said, if your pictures were of a higher resolution, it would definitely help make it more convincing and professional.

    Of course, while looking at your presentation, I already had questions to ask about whether this problem was representative of all faculties which you answered rather well too.

    In terms of vocals, your voice projection was resonable and your tone conveyed a sense of enthusiasm, which was slightly infectious. That's good!

    In terms of improvement, I felt that you could employ a little polite humour regarding the poor studying environment, which I reckon would not be too difficult given our personal understanding and empathy we have over the studying environment.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for your interesting presentation! I enjoyed your part! :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you Yongxin for the feedback. Sorry about the intimidating voice. Guess I was nervous hence I could not control my voice properly?

    I have to agree that I did not connect very well with the audience this time round for the presentation. It is my first "sales presentation" and I was really nervous. I wanted to portray myself as really "enthusiastic" about the proposal. This made me less "natural" and I started to look in one particular direction? I will really keep in mind to maintain eye contact for a slightly longer period of time. This really requires practice, practice and more practice. =D

    And Steph, I did not realise that I was nodding. Hahax. Maybe I was trying to get assurance from the audience? Come to think of it, perhaps I should really stand closer to the screen. It should bring the attention of the audience to the pictures. What do the rest of you think?

    ReplyDelete
  10. You Sheng. You hit the bullseye. Humour is something which I thought would make the presentation more entertaining as well as more impressionable. I thought about this during the planning process for the OP. However, I could not really think of good jokes that would turn out "polite". I fear that the audience (staff of NUS) would see the jokes as an insult to them since they are the planners in the school.

    Guys, it would be nice if we can brainstorm on how to include humour in such presentation to make them more light hearted yet formal?

    Lastly, glad that you enjoyed the presentation.

    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Stanley!

    I agree with You Chean. You are so good natured (as I mentioned on my blog), even when we were a bit too task-oriented at times. You adapted well with us engineers! Hope we didn't overwhelm you with our engineer-ness. And as a year 2, your project work and presentation skills are already solid.

    Thanks for giving your 100% in this project! :))

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks, Stanley, for this very detailed reflection. You obviously feel passionate about the experience as you honestly recall many of the challenges and highlights of your prep and deliver. The take aways from all of this will serve you well in the future, I am sure, and look at all the feedback you have received!

    I really appreciate your effort! Best of luck in your next project work and presentation!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Stanley,

    It was great watching you to present for a change (we were co-presenters during peer teaching). Your tone and volume of your voice exudes confidence. Being the first speaker from the team, this is a positive image and a confidence boost for your team.

    In the non-verbal aspect, I was not particular disturbed by any of your hang gestures and body movement, but I have to say I was drawn to what you were actually saying. Though I have to admit that your speed of delivery was slow for me and I would have preferred you to have spoken a little faster (just a personal preference).

    Having worked closely with you during the peer teaching, the stark improvement that I have seen was the organisation of information in your presentation slides. Though the pictures were hard to decipher, I enjoyed how information were well organised within a slide space and easy to comprehend.

    Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wow, your group ha~really has a very strong teamwork~~~~
    Comparing your peer teaching session with your final project presentation, you improved a lot and sounds much more persuasive and confident. Your gesture and eyecontact also improved a lot~~~you are ready for the outside world~haha~

    ReplyDelete